Untying the Gordian Knot
The media debate regarding DRM over the past few years has pitted two groups against each other: end users accused of wanting a free lunch (e.g., through file sharing) and content owners who sometimes have been overambitious in building fences around their rights.
This paper firstly provides an introduction to the concept of DRM. It then identifies needs of end users and other stakeholder groups and analyzes how well today’s DRM systems fulfil these needs. The paper then analyzes legal and regulatory perspectives around DRM before drawing conclusions on which end game for DRM would be most beneficial for end users as well as other key stakeholder groups along the value chain.
Digital Rights Management (DRM) has evolved as a means to protect the interests of content owners and aggregators to stop (or at least reduce) piracy. However, today’s DRM systems do not sufficiently incorporate the needs of end users and other key stakeholder groups along the digital media distribution value chain.
Going forward, we see three possible scenarios for DRM:
From an end user perspective as well as other key stakeholder groups along the value chain, Scenario 3 above is the scenario that best encompasses the needs of all stakeholder groups.
It is unlikely that we will see the emergence of successful next generation DRM systems that satisfy key stakeholder needs without:
Should this fail, all stakeholder groups may be better off with no DRM (Scenario 2) rather than a series of lopsided variants (Scenario 1).
Social Media: | Services: |Newsletter |Bookmark Arthur D. Little